Obama supporters angered

[scarymary]

over the moderating of the Democratic debate between Clinton and Obama. It appears that Obama's supporters think that Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson butchered the debate last night. I listened to some of it, and I felt that for the most part, it was very enlightening in exposing Obama for the socialist he is.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120847505709424727.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

I was listening to Limbaugh yesterday, he seems to think that the Dems Super Delegates are going to have to pick a third candidate, because neither Obama or Clinton will back down.

If that happens, the Obama supporters will freak out, the race card will be pulled, and the DNC will implode. I have to say, that I can see that happening.

Then a caller phoned in with a hillarious idea

The caller said that the Republicans should give McCain to the Dems, which would allow the GOP to re run it's primary again.

[submarinepainter]

Obamy did not do well this time so he's saying there are too many debates and Moveon.org want the questions to be screen .no more flag pin questions etc

[scarymary]

I believe what angered them most were the questions about Jeremiah Wright and his association with William Ayres. I happen to think that his relationship with these two individuals is very relevant in his bid for the POTUS.

[san clemente]

I believe what angered them most were the questions about Jeremiah Wright and his association with William Ayres. I happen to think that his relationship with these two individuals is very relevant in his bid for the POTUS.I don't believe it to be all that relevant. These politicians cross so many paths. I'm sure they have all been around questionable people at one point or another. Politics are an ugly business right? I don't believe that Obama purposely sought out Ayres to be in the same organization. I think that it happened by chance. Unlesss it could be shown that Obama and Ayres were going to dinner, family picnics, ballgames or whatever, I think that the Ayres ties are a big stretch.

[scarymary]

He has gone to Reverend Wright's church for twenty years. I'm sure that had a Republican attended a church which espoused such anti-American hatred such as Reverend Wright has, that candidate would be questioned about his patronage of said church. As for Ayres, why would he be out making speeches with this fellow unless he felt that his views were in line with his own? Once again, guilt by association..........no matter the party. Not saying it is right or wrong, just saying if it were a Republican candidate who was associated with such individuals, that it would be questionable.

[Bumblebee]

It's not only Obama and his supporters who are whining about the debate, now it's hip hop, too.

Video:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/18/video-not-even-hip-hop-is-safe-from-pro-obama-whining-about-the-debate/

[san clemente]

He has gone to Reverend Wright's church for twenty years. I'm sure that had a Republican attended a church which espoused such anti-American hatred such as Reverend Wright has, that candidate would be questioned about his patronage of said church. As for Ayres, why would he be out making speeches with this fellow unless he felt that his views were in line with his own? Once again, guilt by association..........no matter the party. Not saying it is right or wrong, just saying if it were a Republican candidate who was associated with such individuals, that it would be questionable.Obama's relationship to Wright is absolutely relevant. He should be held accountable in regards to Wright. Not so much the Ayres relationship. I don't think that there is one. I understand the guilt by association. Would that mean that ANYONE who ever crossed paths with Ayres is guilty by association? This a mountain being built by the conservative talking heads that to me is more of a mole hill. Does anyone here honestly believe that Obama endorses terrorism?

[Bumblebee]

SC, the point is that when you keep adding all these things, it looks worse and it is our right to know what kind of man we are getting for president. What do we really know about this man?



● The connection to William Ayers was no accident of geography. Michelle Obama picked him to sit on a panel with Barack in 1997 on juvenile crime, two years after meeting with them for support in his race for the state senate.

● They participated in a panel together called “Intellectuals in Times of Crisis” in 2002, well after Ayers’ comments about being unrepentant for his terrorism got published on 9/11. Bernadine Dohrn participated in a panel at the same event.

●Ayers and Dorhn joined the Obamas in celebrating the departure of Rashid Khalidi to a new post at Columbia University, after Ayers and Obama helped get Woods Foundation funds to Khalidi’s AAAN, to the tune of $75,000. Khalidi was a fanatical supporter of Yasser Arafat and a purported operative of the PLO. Khalidi hosted a fundraiser for Obama in 2000 as well.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/18/guilt-by-association-or-a-verdict-on-judgment/

[Madcowhunter]

Obama's relationship with Wright doesn't bother me so much.

For me, it's not an issue of who he associates with, but what he associates with. What I want to know is if Obama believes in liberation theology, as Wright does. Because if he does, then that would mean he is a bigger socialist and leftist than we think.

[Dr. Madd]

I suggest we give them weapons and let Hillary and Obama fight to the death.

[scarymary]

It has been said that Obama is further left than Hillary Clinton. Has anyone here not heard his wife talking about giving up some your "pie" as she chooses to call it, so others can have more of the pie? Is that not socialist?

[submarinepainter]

It has been said that Obama is further left than Hillary Clinton. Has anyone here not heard his wife talking about giving up some your "pie" as she chooses to call it, so others can have more of the pie? Is that not socialist?

I hate that, Why don't she give up all her pie first then I will believe the rhetoric.

[thumbelina]

It has been said that Obama is further left than Hillary Clinton. Has anyone here not heard his wife talking about giving up some your "pie" as she chooses to call it, so others can have more of the pie? Is that not socialist? Right here (http://www.theamericanright.com/forums/showpost.php?p=109793&postcount=11).

[scarymary]

It is almost hard to believe that anyone could be further left of Hillary, but I believe Obama to be that person. And particularly if he takes his cues from his "pie-eating" wife, Michelle. When she says that most people don't want the whole "pie", that they are just happy to thrive, that is horse dung. I don't know a person who works 40 hours a week who would be pleased to give up more of their "pie" to go to the "bakery" we know as Washington, DC.

[thumbelina]

http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/5296/080131voteratingscb1.gif

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal's 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., the other front-runner in the Democratic presidential race, also shifted to the left last year. She ranked as the 16th-most-liberal senator in the 2007 ratings, a computer-assisted analysis that used 99 key Senate votes, selected by NJ reporters and editors, to place every senator on a liberal-to-conservative scale in each of three issue categories. In 2006, Clinton was the 32nd-most-liberal senator.

In their yearlong race for the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama and Clinton have had strikingly similar voting records. Of the 267 measures on which both senators cast votes in 2007, the two differed on only 10. "The policy differences between Clinton and Obama are so slight they are almost nonexistent to the average voter," said Richard Lau, a Rutgers University political scientist. Link (http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/voteratings/)

[submarinepainter]

here is a letter from an Obama supporter
Letter from an Obama supporter
By Michelle Malkin • February 20, 2008 09:51 AM So full of hope and change! Strong language warning:

from Brandy Priestess playpoli@yahoo.com
to malkinblog@gmail.com,
date Feb 20, 2008 8:44 AM
subject Bitch, you’re retarded and your thoughts on Madame President Obama doesn’t count
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com

Michelle Malkin,
No matter how many white men you ==== and no matter how many white asses you kiss, you will always be “A wanna be white woman”, silly ass Bitch..

Except Bitch,” 2 asians ====ing, don’t make a white”. Do you really think Mrs. Obama gives a ==== about what you think about her?

You have a lot to be thankful for Bitch, ====ing a white man gave you a good life in America, a life you could never have where your ====ing ancestors were born.

Just be thankful that your lack of self decency allowed you to suck the white man’s dick to get where you are in life, you ====ing sell out ====.

Look at what you job is : “MAKING STUPID RACIST COMMENTS ABOUT A WOMAN OF COLOR, WHEN YOU CLAIM YOU’RE A WOMAN OF COLOR.”

Show me the white woman named Ming Lee Malkin, but there’s tons of sell out Asian Bitches like yourself who think nothing of naming your Asian and bi-racial
children white names. Blacks have white names because of Slavery, you have white names and semen in your body because you hate yourself and your slant eyes.
You pray that your bi-racial child by a white man will come out more white than Asian.

No wonder the white man loves Asia to fill out all of his pedophile tendencies, you Bitches will move in with him and let him ==== your children just as long as he’ll give you his credit card and allow you to pretend that you’re an honorary white woman. BITCH PLEASE.

FYI HO: “==== you and the Bitch (your mother) that had you.”

Now how’s that for free speech, silly dumb ass HO?

She says what she means.

My reply:

from Michelle Malkin writemalkin@gmail.com
to Brandy Priestess playpoli@yahoo.com,
date Feb 20, 2008 9:50 AM
subject Re: Bitch, you’re retarded and your thoughts on Madame President Obama doesn’t count
mailed-by gmail.com

Do you feel better now?

I’ll keep you updated.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/20/letter-from-an-obama-supporter/?print=1

[Dr. Madd]

More Liberal Intolerance. The Person who wrote this should have his Human race membership revoked.

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

I emailed the wench......I think everyone that disagrees with her ought to, as well. make sure you have a secondary email account if you choose to do so. Just as a safety precaution.

[submarinepainter]

I not wasting my time WAA but won't call ya names if you do !!! lol

[scarymary]

That is sickening. And we alllow these types of people to go to the polls every four years to vote for the candidate of their choice in a presidential election. We can only hope this individual will be occupied by something more interesting to them than going to the voting booths in November.

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

I got an auto response from the server where her email addy resided.....it said that the account no longer exists....:icon_twis

Seems like I'm not the only one who thought it a good idea to email the biznatch

[Dr. Madd]

Put the contents up. I gotta see this!

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

Mail Delivery Subsystem to Whitey
show details May 10 (1 day ago) Reply

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

playpoli@yahoo.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: Gmail tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. The error that the other server returned was: 554 554 delivery error: dd Sorry your message to playpoli@yahoo.com cannot be delivered. This account has been disabled or discontinued [#102]. - mta119.mail.re1.yahoo.com. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. Thanks for your continued support. (state 17)

----- Original message -----

Received: by 10.142.177.7 with SMTP id z7mr2383488wfe.238.1210418089277;
Sat, 10 May 2008 04:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.200.8 with HTTP; Sat, 10 May 2008 04:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9ec37e3c0805100414s7100bc8fyf0e196e059c8a22d@mail. gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 07:14:48 -0400
From: "Tom Sheasby" <whiteafricanamerican@gmail.com>
To: playpoli@yahoo.com
Subject: What a dismal life you must have....
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_6715_25757168.1210418089269"

------=_Part_6715_25757168.1210418089269
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

You racist wench.

I saw your brain fart on Malkin's site today...lol you are one seriously ====ed up person. Here I was thinking that intolerance was a hallmark of left wing animal molestors like yourself.

God how pathetic your life must be.

Now, go crawl back down into your parents basement where you belong you irrelevant excuse for a human being.

Whitey

[Dr. Madd]

LOL.. Whitey, I wish that had made it through and we had a camera on her when she read it.