"The Wrong Army"

[Vendetta]

This is a really cool thread that my grandmother sent me. This is really cool.

http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THEWRONGARMY.HTML

[BLUETEAMSCHURCH]

very nice i like it

[Bumblebee]

Thank you Vendetta, it was all so true. I loved it.

[The anti liberal]

We win because we have God on our side. How did a rag tag underquiped army defeat the best army in the world during the revolution? God's divine intervention.

[Dr. Madd]

You know if the Liberals were in Charge in 1776, we'd still be British.

[Dr. Madd]

You know what makes me nauseous? That while defending my freedom, and I appreciate it! - They have to defend the freedoms of the same idjits who badmouth them all the time. It is perverse to use freedom to condemn the artificers of that freedom.

[Aurelius]

Madd, the Revolutionists were the anti-establishment and ... well liberal people of the day. They were against the ruling government and they held social views which were contrary to the norm.

[Madcowhunter]

You're confusing modern-day liberalism with classic liberalism. The two are unrelated.
Classic liberalism is essentially the same as Constitutional Conservativism.

[Aurelius]

Yes, but you totally missed the point of them being liberals of the day. Stand in terror that the liberalism of today will be the conservatism of the future! Tempestuous as the sea, and stronger than the foundations of the earth! All shall love modern liberalism and despair! I know that being liberal now means you aren't living in the Industrial Revolution, but hey... whatcha gonna do?

[Dr. Madd]

Now that you're free of your self-inflicted coma, It's time to play.



Yes, but you totally missed the point of them being liberals of the day. Stand in terror that the liberalism of today will be the conservatism of the future! Tempestuous as the sea, and stronger than the foundations of the earth! All shall love modern liberalism and despair! I know that being liberal now means you aren't living in the Industrial Revolution, but hey... whatcha gonna do?

What does it mean to be a liberal?

To be a liberal you must:

1. Reject everything you were ever taught , regardless of the wisdom thereof.

2. Accept reality as the Democratic party ordains it

3. believe that guns kill people and AIDS does not.

4. Believe that babies should die and that baby seals, farm animals, criminals and terrorists should not.

5. That the rich shouldn't be rich, unless you are rich, then you should be exempt.

6. That a country can tax itself into prosperity.

7. That Conservative Capitalists believe that resources are unlimited, but Socialism is realistic in its estimation of unlimited wealth.

8. Everyone should have a freedom of opinion-as long as it follows the party line.

9. Freedom of Religion- if you aren't a Christian. Then it's freedom from religion.

10. That a kid's parents are dangerous to a kid for spanking them, but a pair of Homosexual foster parents isn't.

11. That capitulation and foreign domination are superior to bloodshed.

12. Traditionalists are too old fashioned to be practical, but ideagogues like Al Gore are on the money.

[Aurelius]

That's your normal list of worthless statements. I doubt you could find one person out there that agrees with that entire list, but I know you believe in a liberal collective - you can't handle the thought of a lack of one.


Reject everything you were ever taught , regardless of the wisdom thereof.

Everything I was ever taught is what I rely upon. It's conservatives that have told me that my history, economic, and social education are objectionable.


That Conservative Capitalists believe that resources are unlimited, but Socialism is realistic in its estimation of unlimited wealth.

I had never heard of unlimited resources until I hopped on this board and Wadi mentioned it. Never have I heard that socialism believes in unlimited wealth. I thought the point of socialism was to take limited wealth and resources and more evenly distribute them throughout a population. Don't respond saying socialism is bad, respond instead to how it is applied to your statement.

I don't feel the need to go on. There are a lot more pegs in the bucket than you have holes in your board. Find a better board.

[Dr. Madd]

That's your normal list of worthless statements. I doubt you could find one person out there that agrees with that entire list, but I know you believe in a liberal collective - you can't handle the thought of a lack of one.

Show me where you dissent from the Liberal Taliban.




Everything I was ever taught is what I rely upon. It's conservatives that have told me that my history, economic, and social education are objectionable.

What a horrible childhood you must have had, being brainwashed with liberal nonsense from infancy.




I had never heard of unlimited resources until I hopped on this board and Wadi mentioned it. Never have I heard that socialism believes in unlimited wealth. I thought the point of socialism was to take limited wealth and resources and more evenly distribute them throughout a population. Don't respond saying socialism is bad, respond instead to how it is applied to your statement.

Socialism claims to redistribute wealth, but usually ends up with wealthy gov't and poor people.It is not the equal distribution of wealth and goods, but the across the board distribution of misery to the common man. His work means nothing under Socialism, and no Gov't, short of turning to full-fledged Marxism can feed an entire population. That drains money and resources and Socialism will go broke faster than Bill Clinton in a hooters. It cannot produce enough largesse to compensate for its distributory expenditures.




I don't feel the need to go on. There are a lot more pegs in the bucket than you have holes in your board. Find a better board.

Don't feel the need, or are unable to go on? I'm voting on the latter.
Pegs in the bucket and the board? Maybe you're half-asleep now?
translate, Sleepyhead.

[Aurelius]

Pegs in the bucket and the board?

It's a children's learning exercise for basic recognition of shapes. You put the square peg in the square hole, the star peg in the star hole. You have only a few different views of people (holes) when in fact there are many more people with many more views (pegs). It's very convenient to stereotype all liberals, or all conservatives depending on which side you're on, but that's just not how the real world works.


What a horrible childhood you must have had, being brainwashed with liberal nonsense from infancy.

What a horrible childhood you must have had, being denied access to early educational tools. Did this level of access continue through your elementary and high school education as well?

We've already been over in another thread that I don't believe in the abolishment of religion which is something you believe liberals must hold true.

[Dr. Madd]

It's a children's learning exercise for basic recognition of shapes. You put the square peg in the square hole, the star peg in the star hole. You have only a few different views of people (holes) when in fact there are many more people with many more views (pegs). It's very convenient to stereotype all liberals, or all conservatives depending on which side you're on, but that's just not how the real world works.

Your experiences with the puerile, pre-adolescent piece of kindergarten diversion are much more recent than my own. That said, Actually, unlike Liberals, I see people as individuals. Liberals have given up that individuality.
Liberals make labels for Everything, from hyphenated citizen names to false ethnic groups.




What a horrible childhood you must have had, being denied access to early educational tools. Did this level of access continue through your elementary and high school education as well?

Considering, aside from one instance when I replied half-asleep (and only misspelled one word, despite the lack of coherence), I'd say my education, at a private, Christian school was superior to yours, as it taught me to think for myself. And I can use large words without a thesaurus.


We've already been over in another thread that I don't believe in the abolishment of religion which is something you believe liberals must hold true.

But what about Christianity? Should Christians be able to have public displays of faith?

[Aurelius]

But what about Christianity? Should Christians be able to have public displays of faith?

Is Christianity a religion?

[Dr. Madd]

Is Christianity a religion?


In the eyes of sane people, yes.. In the eyes of Moonbat Liberal borg, who can tell?

[Aurelius]

Get a grip on your bias.

Is free speech a right?

Err... durr... in the eyes of a crazy conservative, who can tell? HUGUCK

That bit was mocking sarcasm by the way. Tune out the extremist or you're no better than your "moonbat liberal Borg".

[Dr. Madd]

Get a grip on your bias.

The only Bias here is that against the Judeo-Christian Tradition.



Is free speech a right?

Unless you mention Jesus, yes. Mention Satan, porn, gays, abortion, but never the Christian God.


Err... durr... in the eyes of a crazy conservative, who can tell? HUGUCK

That only reveals your contempt of the common man and your taliban-like intolerance. Your facade is gone, brute, Dawn take you and be stone to you.


That bit was mocking sarcasm by the way.

if you have to tell us it's a joke, it isn't funny.



Tune out the extremist or you're no better than your "moonbat liberal Borg".

No better than you? I could be dead and still be better than you.

[Aurelius]

What did I just say about nuh uh posts? Your bias aka hatred blinded you.

Let me spell this out for you:

I support religion existing in America. Christianity is a religion. Therefore I support Christianity existing in America.
If others or myself write sarcasm you say it wasn't. The need to express that it is sarcasm is a reflection upon you, not upon our writings.


We're right back on track to where things seemed when I first got here. Divisiveness and blaming. By the way what conservative speaker started using liberal Taliban again?

[Dr. Madd]

What did I just say about nuh uh posts? Your bias aka hatred blinded you.

Let me spell this out for you:

I support religion existing in America. Christianity is a religion. Therefore I support Christianity existing in America.

"Nuh Uh" posts- What in the name of all that's holy are you babbling about?
I gave you a post with facts, and that's all you got? Piss poor display, rookie.
Liberals say that stuff in theory, but when it comes time to practice, it's a different story. Liberals speak out of both sides of their mouths, telling people what they want to hear.




If others or myself write sarcasm you say it wasn't. The need to express that it is sarcasm is a reflection upon you, not upon our writings.


And the fact that you have to spell it out as sarcasm say that you know it is not particularly humorous. Don't try humor, little man, you might hurt yourself. At any rate, you'll look dumb..er.




We're right back on track to where things seemed when I first got here. Divisiveness and blaming. By the way what conservative speaker started using liberal Taliban again?

We never left the track. Division and Blaming are the liberals' lock stock and trade. They invented the victim "Poor twisted me" mentality. As for what speaker, no idea. I don't watch the news often, I read it through yahoo and the like. Moreover, if you're hinting that I borrowed it, as it seems you are, think again.

[witchdr]

AURELIUS Chistianity isn't a religion it is THE religion all is nothing more than glorified paganismand as far as DR'MADDs list it seems right on the money to me but that is just the opinion of one educated ,gun toting,hardcore conservative,republican redneck

[Dr. Madd]

Well, Aury, there goes your claim that no one would agree with me.

[the-man]

This is a really cool thread that my grandmother sent me. This is really cool.

http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THEWRONGARMY.HTML

I just realized that you can relate this to spider-man.

[witchdr]

we should all remember the quoe from a very learned man "I may not agree with anything a person says ,but I shall defend to the death thier right to say it".Who was that learned man...............ME!! Just remember not to generalize it takes away from everyone.

[Tater]

I also agee totally with Dr. Madd's list. Aurelius just wants to argue with someone in my opinion....as wich dr. says "he would argue with a fence post..."