Path to 9/11

[Guns R Cool]

It's on right now on ABC. Watch it.

[BushRocks]

I AM!

Ready to watch Bill Clinton's ==== ups?

[Nerf Hofflemire]

Man, I wish I had cable. All i've got is :mad: CBS. It's got some good stuff like Survivor and that 70's show, but the news is really liberal (A.K.A. Katie Couric)

[BushRocks]

This movie is making Bill Clinton and Sandy Berger look like cowards. Finally they get what they deserve broadcasted to thousands of Americans.

[Guns R Cool]

Make that millions now. And in Canada. If the Liberals hadn't made such a big deal about it, I never would have heard about it.

[biggie67uga]

This is freakin awesome.....precisely making the Clinton administration out to what it really was...cowards and failures to accomplish anything.:mad1: :frown1:

[standsalone]

The movie isn't worthy of my comments.

[Arbiter]

GOOD, i'm glad it has rendered you speechless. No one wants to hear your trolling filth anyhow.


I'm looking forward to either recording it, or watching the 2nd part. (there are 2 parts, right?)


I didn't know the 1st was tonight :frown:

[Wadi66]

Just finished watching the first half, will watch the second tomorrow. I hope this wakes up a few people to the challange posed in fighting this WOT and how the government is its own worst enemy.

They showed some previews of the second half and the USS Cole is brought up. In the movie they criticize both the Clinton and Bush administrations for not responding. Ummmmm, did I miss something? Was Bush expected to respond to something that didn't happen on his watch?

[Dr. Madd]

That is a good question.

[earthtoned]

i think this was fairly well done so far, but i'm not sure it really sways anyones penchant to blame clinton if they didn't already. I'm sure i'll get disareement on this, but it's really impossible to take todays post 9/11 mindset and apply it to pre-9/11 politics. how many times do you remember terrorism or national security brought up during the 2000 election? It wasn't considered much an issue at all. hindsight is 20/20. it was clearly a blunder to not respond to the uss cole incident. But until americans themselves saw a clear danger confronting them in their own cities, it was relegated to the back pages of our newpapers, and therefore not treated with the seriousness that it obviously is now

[Bumblebee]

Wadi, Dr. Madd, I don't think Bush's speech tomorrow has anything to do with the movie. It just happen to fall at that time. That's what was reported

Did you notice how they put up that sign explaining that it was a dramatization, etc. 3 times? Wasn't there talk that the part about Osama and how he could have had him? Rush Limbaugh saw the movie a few days ago, it will come out if they cut anything out.

All I know is that it did tell a lot of the truth we have always talked about. Wonder what they will say about Bush? That he was warned and did nothing too?

[Bumblebee]

earthtoned]i think this was fairly well done so far, but i'm not sure it really sways anyones penchant to blame clinton if they didn't already.
For the die hard liberals, it won't, but for the many people that don't read and don't care, the movie will make many people see how serious we should take what's happening in this Islamic global war on terror.

[standsalone]

This movie that you so strongly recommend is fiction, it is the work of very talented Hollywood writers. Are you so naive as to believe it? Good Lord...

[Arbiter]

You don't believe farenheit (sp?) 9/11 do you?



Argh... i'm sorry i missed the first part...
Does the 2nd part air tonight?

[standsalone]

This isn't a discussion about F 9/11. Why do you go off topic?

[Arbiter]

Actually, i thought i posted something on topic as well... though, you know, i don't remember... oh yea. i did.


You are taking it off topic by explaing that this isn't a thread about F911.

Besides,is it so hard to answer the question?




ON TOPIC: What have they blamed on Bush (Jr) in the movie?

and... is it a movie?

[Dr. Madd]

Wadi, Dr. Madd, I don't think Bush's speech tomorrow has anything to do with the movie. It just happen to fall at that time. That's what was reported

Did you notice how they put up that sign explaining that it was a dramatization, etc. 3 times? Wasn't there talk that the part about Osama and how he could have had him? Rush Limbaugh saw the movie a few days ago, it will come out if they cut anything out.

All I know is that it did tell a lot of the truth we have always talked about. Wonder what they will say about Bush? That he was warned and did nothing too?

I knew that, But I still think that Clinton and the Libs and Bin Laden are somehow in Cohorts.

[thumbelina]

Guns R Cool posted a link to the missing scenes here (http://www.theamericanright.com/forums/showpost.php?p=74600&postcount=1).

Yes, Arbiter, 2 parts: http://abc.go.com/movies/thepathto911/index.html and you can watch the 1st night online: http://pathto911.abc.com/index.html.

[Guns R Cool]

At least someone saw that link.

I watched it and it didn't contradict history at all. The 'made up' stuff wasn't huge things. It was done to fill in scenes that are unknown for the most part. Basically an educated guess. Sort of like the Perfect Storm, they had to make up the second part of the movie because everyone died and no one knows what really happened.

[biggie67uga]

For those of you that missed it. The first part was the lead up to the 9/11 attacks. The first part includes the attack on two embassies in Africa, which in turn leads to the cruise missiles strike to "take out Osama" but was most likely to draw attention away from Clinton's "dicking" around in the oval office. It basically explains, this is a scene that is most likely fiction but the conversation with Madeline Albright makes a whole lot of sense I highly doubt that the conversation after the strike was very far from this scene, how Pakistan was notified of the cruise missiles flying over their airspace going to "take out Osama" but since the Pakistani Govt. has strong ties with the taliban, the forewarning from Madeline Albright most likely gave Bin Laden the much needed time to get the hell out of dodge. The movie or 'docudrama' has been very well executed so far and I truly think that the educated guesses placed on the actual conversations that went on behind closed doors, are right on the money. Given no one will ever know because the people in office then will do anything to save their asses from the fire but I really think that the "dramatized conversations were dead on."

[IHL]

This movie that you so strongly recommend is fictionIs 9/11 fiction? The movie isn't fiction. To say so is absurd. It isn't entirely factual either perhaps which is why they call it a 'docu-drama'. But to dismiss it all as fiction is ridiculous.

The question about whether you believe F 9/11 isn't off topic at all in my opinion. It's a good test of your basis in calling this movie fiction. If you consider this fiction, we are all curious to see how you would classify F 9/11. A movie that isn't only fiction, but has been proven to contain outright lies and misrepresentations.

Or, do you see 'The Path to 9/11' as fiction simply because it doesn't hold the liberals to some false pedestal they are so used to being put upon by the media?