PDA

View Full Version : ACLU: No 'Jesus Memorial' for Katrina Victims


Pages : [1] 2
namvet
08-09-2006, 10:17 AM
a bust of hitler or stalin is preferable
http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/8/8/171637.shtml?s=ic
Dagummit
08-09-2006, 11:07 AM
Damn the ACLU and damn mother yukon...you satanic f-ck!
namvet
08-09-2006, 11:07 AM
I agree that a reliously neutral memorial is indeed more fitting for a public place. There were Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, and many other religions that were affected by the hurricane. It is outrageous that only a Christian symbol would be placed in a public thouroughfare. The Constipation denmands a separation of church and state.

Would you object if a statue of the Prohet Mohhamed was erected instead of Jesus?

my work with you is finished.
alwaysRight
08-09-2006, 11:16 AM
Get 'em Namvet... !!!
namvet
08-09-2006, 11:59 AM
Get 'em Namvet... !!!

every time she threads i get a liberal virus alert
shotdrops286
08-09-2006, 12:08 PM
It is outrageous that only a Christian symbol would be placed in a public thouroughfare.

its on PRIVATE LAND next to a public thoroughfare.



Would you object if a statue of the Prohet Mohhamed was erected instead of Jesus?

as long as it was built with private donations and built on private land like the cross then no
FKLBRLS
08-09-2006, 12:24 PM
What is wrong with them putting up this memorial? It would be on private land anyway. And if it was a symbol from another religion, there would not be any controversy. There is nothing wrong with public religious expression. This parish wants to put up a cross they have every right to do so, it does nothing to the freedom of other people to practice their religion.
alwaysRight
08-09-2006, 12:35 PM
I'm sorry to hear that you feel I am a liberal Namvet... While you were gone I was the one who started a thread about you for you to hopefully see that I was hoping everything was okay with you since you hadn't been around in a couple months. See where my caringness gets me?

http://www.theamericanright.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3809


And I was going to stick up for you...
namvet
08-09-2006, 12:38 PM
I'm sorry to hear that you feel I am a liberal Namvet... While you were gone I was the one who started a thread about you for you to hopefully see that I was hoping everything was okay with you since you hadn't been around in a couple months. See where my caringness gets me?

And I was going to stick up for you...

when did i acuse you of being a lib???? im not. sorry for any misunderstanding.
alwaysRight
08-09-2006, 12:40 PM
every time she threads i get a liberal virus alert


You quoted me and said this after I told you to "Go get Yukon.."
namvet
08-09-2006, 12:45 PM
You quoted me and said this after I told you to "Go get Yukon.."

every time yukon post i get a virus alert.
alwaysRight
08-09-2006, 12:49 PM
Oh you were talking about Yukon? Ahhh I see! Sorry
Schmitty27
08-09-2006, 01:03 PM
Yeah AR, some people feel its best to call Yukon a she because of the obvious lying on...its part, and they feel its a safe bet to assume its a female. But as of right now I am opting to call it an it.
namvet
08-09-2006, 01:24 PM
yukon did NOT serve in the military let alone nam. there is a very easy way for vets to prove they served. even on a message board. I changelled him to prove it and and he waved the white flag and then cut and ran.
yukon is a coward and i proved it. nough said
alwaysRight
08-09-2006, 04:19 PM
I assumed (and I know I shouldn't have!) that when Vet said "she" he was talking about me bc of our little disagreement on the 9/11 thread. But I understand now that he was talking about Mr/Mrs. Con.

Man it's hard sometimes on boards like this to tell what and who people are talking to!
Dr. Madd
08-09-2006, 10:41 PM
*sighs in relief at Alwaysright and Namvet working things out* Now, my stance on the cross.. I believe that to stop a religious symbol from going up, that is in itself an endorsement of Atheism, which is itself a religious philosophy. That also violates the separation of church and state that the ACLU likes to drag up.
The anti liberal
08-10-2006, 03:40 AM
Wow, I have never seen so many deleted posts on a thread before. I wonder how bad Namvets posts could have been to have them deleted.
The anti liberal
08-10-2006, 03:50 AM
I agree that a reliously neutral memorial is indeed more fitting for a public place. There were Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, and many other religions that were affected by the hurricane. It is outrageous that only a Christian symbol would be placed in a public thouroughfare. The Constipation denmands a separation of church and state.

Would you object if a statue of the Prohet Mohhamed was erected instead of Jesus?


If other religious denominations want to put up thier own symbols to memorialize the lives lost then they should be able to as well. But so far it has only been a cross they were trying to put up.
namvet
08-10-2006, 10:03 AM
Wow, I have never seen so many deleted posts on a thread before. I wonder how bad Namvets posts could have been to have them deleted.
sorry. had to use my brass knuckles on a lib yesterday. Wadi deleted all the threads and the lib got pissed calling her and IHL dirty names. VET
Topiary Lady
08-10-2006, 10:20 AM
This particular cross issue certainly exposes the ACLU's hypocrisy does'nt it? They have put up such a stink over the Soledad cross with the reason that it is on public land. They have repeatedly claimed that crosses on private property would not be targeted. So, what do they do? They go after a proposed cross on private property. Hypocrites.

I hope every city fights this lunacy just as San Diego has. We won down here and it's the ordinary citizens that fought the hardest and made Washington listen. Never cave in to the ACLU....NEVER.
Oi_Ve
08-10-2006, 01:00 PM
Wow, I can't believe I'm saying this, but Yukon is right!

There is and should be a seperation of church and state in this nation, and it's about time people started recognizing it!

Starting with the ACLU! (zing)

A private church is building a private memorial on private land through private funds- the government has NO power to interfear in this matter, meaning the ACLU has no case.

If this church put up a memorial with Muhammud on it, fine. Granted we've all seen what happens when you depict Muhammud (http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2006/Riots_in_the_Streets/images/01.jpg), but hey, it's a free nation.
If another religion wants to put up a memorial on private land via private funding, they can.

The ACLU is the only organization I know who can take a wonderful thing like private expenditures and turn it into a problem.
Oi_Ve
08-10-2006, 08:30 PM
My child, I have never posted anything here that wasn't correct! Thank you for the vote of confidence (I will only be responding to positive posts).

Father Yukon

1. I'm 6 years your senior, so do not call me "your child". If you wish to address me like a man, fine.

2. I was being sarcastic if you didn't get that from my post.
Guns R Cool
08-10-2006, 09:30 PM
ACLU=communists
Dr. Madd
08-10-2006, 11:16 PM
As I've said, Atheism is a religious preference encompassing no beliefs at all in the afterlife or God. Therefore to make anything as the ACLU wants, "Godless" Is violating the establishment clause that they love to throw around. check and mate. Bring on the cross!
Topiary Lady
08-11-2006, 10:56 AM
No one is buying this routine of yours Yukon. In case you have missed it, may I direct you to the Humor section of TAR? Perhaps the creator(s) of "Father Yukon" might enjoy posting this nonsense elsewhere.

Looks to me like F-Y has been enjoying far too many shots of that Holy Bong Water of his.