Pentagon lists homosexuality as disorder

[Dagummit]

There has to be a line drawn to what is normal and what is abnormal (criminal). The libs have been trying to gray this line and blur it across several tenants of each topic and with the defunct court system, they have been slowly winning. But alas...the American people have stood the ground and said, "Not any more".

Pay attention stillingnorant or whatever your liberal psuedoname is...

- Marriage has always been between a man and a woman...
- Libs want the line smeared over to include people of the same sex...
- If this were to happen, historical evidence of liberal psychosis shows that it wouldn't stop there...the "consent" factor would then start to blur...
- People to have the right to have sex with their animals would fall next, since they are only property and not human life...
- At the same time libs would say it is okay for a 60 year man to sleep with a 17 year old girl, ....then after a few years, that age would drop to 16...why not? It is only a year, right?
- By the time you know it...libs would have this country so demoralized that people would have legalized marriages between pets and open sex with 10 year olds...all in the name of "choice".

The shit needs to stop...for a man to look at another mans hairy ass and get aroused is flat out unnatural and wrong....same goes for two women...just as wrong.

[Guns R Cool]

By the time you know it...libs would have this country so demoralized that people would have legalized marriages between pets and open sex with 10 year olds...all in the name of "choice"..

That's exaclty what happened in the Netherlands. They legalized gay marriage and now these perverts want to have the age of consent lowered to the age of 12 and the want to legalize beastiality.

[Nerf Hofflemire]

^
^
^
#81 (WAA)

Thank you.

[shotdrops286]

Adultery and rape are both unwanted sexual activity that both cause emotional stress and adversley affect the happiness of the victim. The only caveat is that rape has a physical aspect to it.

adultery is not an unwanted sexual activity

its between two voluntary consenting adults

a·dul·ter·y (ə-dŭl'tə-rē, -trē) pronunciation
n., pl. -ies.

Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse.

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

adultery is not an unwanted sexual activity

Obviously, you aren't married. If you were, you'd understand what I'm talking about.

There are TWO people in a marriage shotdrops, and it wouldn't be called adultery if one of those was ok with the other of the two sowing his or her wild oats.

So, yeah, for the spouse who's being cheated on adultery IS unwanted sexual activity.

Silly liberal, trying to justify adultery.

[shotdrops286]

The one cheated on is not involved in the sexual activity. Sure there is a victim in adultery but adultery and rape are two different things.

And you really need to come up with something better, calling people liberal as form of derogatory insult is getting old.

[Jimbo]

There has to be a line drawn to what is normal and what is abnormal (criminal). The libs have been trying to gray this line and blur it across several tenants of each topic and with the defunct court system, they have been slowly winning. But alas...the American people have stood the ground and said, "Not any more".

Pay attention stillingnorant or whatever your liberal psuedoname is...

- Marriage has always been between a man and a woman...
- Libs want the line smeared over to include people of the same sex...
- If this were to happen, historical evidence of liberal psychosis shows that it wouldn't stop there...the "consent" factor would then start to blur...
- People to have the right to have sex with their animals would fall next, since they are only property and not human life...
- At the same time libs would say it is okay for a 60 year man to sleep with a 17 year old girl, ....then after a few years, that age would drop to 16...why not? It is only a year, right?
- By the time you know it...libs would have this country so demoralized that people would have legalized marriages between pets and open sex with 10 year olds...all in the name of "choice".

The shit needs to stop...for a man to look at another mans hairy ass and get aroused is flat out unnatural and wrong....same goes for two women...just as wrong.

OH come ON Dag you know the scene from Starsky and Hutch with Elektra and whoeverthehell else turned you on:icon_mrgr

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

The one cheated on is not involved in the sexual activity. Sure there is a victim in adultery but adultery and rape are two different things.

You just contradicted yourself in the same sentence.

Unless of course you think the victim of adultery is somehow not as important as a victim of rape, that the victim of adultery does not suffer to the same degree as someone who is raped.

Like I said, the only caveat is that there is a physical aspect to rape, and that's about it.



And you really need to come up with something better, calling people liberal as form of derogatory insult is getting old.

Quid pro quo for you and your left wing crackhead buddies.

[shotdrops286]

You just contradicted yourself in the same sentence.

Unless of course you think the victim of adultery is somehow not as important as a victim of rape, that the victim of adultery does not suffer to the same degree as someone who is raped.

Like I said, the only caveat is that there is a physical aspect to rape, and that's about it.

i did not contradict myself and yes i think a victim of adultery is a lot less a victim then a victim of rape. But that my personal opinion and i dont expect everyone to follow it.





Quid pro quo for you and your left wing crackhead buddies.

sorry im not a democrat/liberal

im more of a libertarian but i normally lean right

hate to break the stereotype

I also dont smoke crack

your personal attacks are fun

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

i did not contradict myself Sure you did.

The one cheated on is not involved in the sexual activity
What are you saying here? that because the one cheated on is not involved in the act, that they are not affected by the activity? right?

So essentially by this statement you're saying that the one cheated on is not a victim.

Then you say:
Sure there is a victim in adulterySo, there isn't a victim, then there is.

Contradiction.
and yes i think a victim of adultery is a lot less a victim then a victim of rape. Tell that to the spouses, who after find out their spouses cheated on them, committed suicide. Somehow I think they would disagree with you.
But that my personal opinion and i dont expect everyone to follow it.Then don't present it as fact.
sorry im not a democrat/liberalYou quack like one
im more of a libertarian but i normally lean rightDon't make me research your posts and demonstrate how full of crap that statement is.
hate to break the stereotype

I also dont smoke crackI see figures of speech are lost on you too.
your personal attacks are funTHere you go contradicting yourself again.

Tell me, if they're so much fun, why then did you say this:
And you really need to come up with something better, calling people liberal as form of derogatory insult is getting old.Really shotdrops, I did expect more from you.

[shotdrops286]

Sure you did.

What are you saying here? that because the one cheated on is not involved in the act, that they are not affected by the activity? right? thats where your assumption is wrong. The one who was cheated on was not part on the consensual sex betweeen the two other people.
Tell that to the spouses, who after find out their spouses cheated on them, committed suicide. Somehow I think they would disagree with you.id like to see you tell a woman who was raped that their trauma is no more significant then a woman/man who was cheated on.
Then don't present it as fact.i didn't as soon as i presented it i stated it was my opinion
Don't make me research your posts and demonstrate how full of crap that statement is.Please do
THere you go contradicting yourself again.nope not again since i never contradicted myself the first time. I said people using liberal on this site was getting old and asked for you to come up with something better. You did... i find this fun
Really shotdrops, I did expect more from you.thanx mom im trying my best :)

[WhiteAfricanAmerican]

thats where your assumption is wrong. The one who was cheated on was not part on the consensual sex betweeen the two other people.Tell me shotdrops, what defines the rape? The physical scares or the mental/emotional ones?
id like to see you tell a woman who was raped that their trauma is no more significant then a woman/man who was cheated on.Are you married shotdrops?
i didn't as soon as i presented it i stated it was my opinionYou presented it 2 reply's prior as fact, and added the 'my opinon' part afterward
Please doOn the Mel Gibson thread:
and of course he is anti-semitic im sure most of you saw the passion of the christLiberal Position #1: A Christian, creating a Christian movie around the historical crucifiction of Christ, MUST be anti-semetic seeing as how the historical fact that the Jewish leadership of the time were responsible for the execution.

In the Libera Logic Inconsitencies thread:
In 20 years if all those unwanted babies were still around there would be a huge portion of the population that would probably be low income and probably uneducated and those are the primary supporters of the liberal agenda. SO keep trying to make abortion illegal it would just be killing the republican party...Abortion is pseudo-population control, and were it not for abortion there'd be a stack of poor people to deal with.

Again on the Liberal Logic Inconsistenies thread:
ummm the sea turtles are endangered and humans are not...Commenting on the disparity on abortion/protection when it comes to turtle unborn vs human unborn.

That's only three that I threw together in 10 minutes. Want anymore?
nope not again since i never contradicted myself the first time. I said people using liberal on this site was getting old and asked for you to come up with something better. You did... i find this funYou can try to spin it shotdrops, isn't gonna help.

Particularly considering that you find me labeling a liberal "a liberal" more offensive than labeling a liberal "a crackhead".

Besides which, only liberals take offense to the word liberal being used as a derogatory.

[shotdrops286]

Tell me shotdrops, what defines the rape? The physical scares or the mental/emotional ones?i think the unwanted penis entering the vagina or unwanted penis entering the anus defines rape
Are you married shotdrops?surely am
You presented it 2 reply's prior as fact, and added the 'my opinon' part afterwardhere is the first time i mentioned it
i did not contradict myself and yes i think a victim of adultery is a lot less a victim then a victim of rape. But that my personal opinion and i dont expect everyone to follow it.the post right after that you said i stated it as fact and the post right before you asked me how i felt about the differing victims.. I stated how i FELT which was my OPINION which i stated in my answer to your question.
On the Mel Gibson thread:
Liberal Position #1: A Christian, creating a Christian movie around the historical crucifiction of Christ, MUST be anti-semetic seeing as how the historical fact that the Jewish leadership of the time were responsible for the execution.sorry it was a poor attempt at sarcasm
In the Libera Logic Inconsitencies thread:

Abortion is pseudo-population control, and were it not for abortion there'd be a stack of poor people to deal with.Sorry i read a funny article about how liberals are killing off potential voters and i thought it was funny. If you would have read further in that thread you will see that i say i couldnt care less about abortion. I wouldnt want my wife or SO gettign an abortion but thats my own personal views. But that wouldnt make your case so nice Michael Moore move ;)
Again on the Liberal Logic Inconsistenies thread:

Commenting on the disparity on abortion/protection when it comes to turtle unborn vs human unborn.i responded to a question someone asked why and again if you would have read the rest of my posts you would have seen that i said i dont agree with it but that could be a reason the left protects the eggs.
That's only three that I threw together in 10 minutes. Want anymore?Not really becasue you are proving nothing and rehashing old posts out of context. But if you want to feel free to make a thread trying to prove im a liberal. Ask me how i feel about whatever issue I will be totally honest and then you can form a better opinion.. We have deviated from the topic of this thread
You can try to spin it shotdrops, isn't gonna help.

Particularly considering that you find me labeling a liberal "a liberal" more offensive than labeling a liberal "a crackhead".

Besides which, only liberals take offense to the word liberal being used as a derogatory.i dont take offense, i jsut siad using liberal as a deragotory insult is getting old if someone is not an extremist on this site you flame them as liberals. I voted for Bush and will prolly continue to vote republican unless some other candidate runs on a platform that i totally agree with.