PDA

View Full Version : War on Terror Quotes



Benado
11-03-2005, 08:30 AM
I just picked these up from www.rushlimbaugh.com. It's a pretty good list of Dems who supported the war in Iraq.

John Kerry, January 23rd, 2003: "Without question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he's miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction."

"If Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -- Bill Clinton, February 17th, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction." -- Madeleine Albright, February 1st, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has ten times since 1983." -- Sandy Berger, Clinton national security advisor, February 18th, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." That from a letter to President Clinton signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, October 9th, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16th, 1998


"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeleine Albright, Clinton's secretary of state, November 10th, 1999

"We begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Senator Carl Levin (D-MI), September 19th, 2002

"We know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, September 23rd, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, September 23rd, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27th, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of '98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons." -- Robert Byrd (D-WV) October 3rd, 2002.

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Senator Bob Graham, Democrat, Florida, December 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Senator Hillary Clinton, October 10th of 2002

"There was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Senator Jay Rockefeller, October 10th, 2002

Here's an excerpt from Rush's commentary that brings this full circle:
"Somebody tell me, when this is known, when this is on the record, when this can be found, when anybody can look this up, when there is audio and video of most of these statements, how in the world do you make a case in 2005 that you need to be reelected because the president of the United States in 2002 lied to you, when you yourself, four years prior, three years prior to George Bush uttering a syllable about this, were saying the same things yourself? Carl Levin, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger, Nancy Pelosi -- these are all the card-carrying leaders of the left's anti-war brigade today. "Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction! Intelligence was manipulated! We were tricked!" How do you explain your consistency on this issue for five years prior to Bush, three years prior to him even assuming office?"

IHL
11-03-2005, 10:15 AM
I wrote about this almost a year ago...

Liberal Hypocrisy (http://www.theamericanright.com/vbforum/showthread.php?t=238)

They will just say that they were echoing what they were told by this president.

The bottom line is that they all believed it. They echoed it when it was politically popular. And here is the worst part...

Let's just say that the president had not gone to war, just as the liberals are now saying he shouldn't have. And let's just say that Iraq did have the weapons and the intelligence suggested and that all were claiming - even the liberals. And let's also say that we were attacked again. You can bet that the liberals would have been screaming that George Bush didn't protect us. That there was clear evidence and intelligence that Saddam had weapons and George Bush failed to act. They would have been blaming him for that second attack just like they blame him for the first one because he didn't prevent that one.

The liberals have the advantage of hindsight. They can sit back and do nothing, just like Clinton did. They can wait and see how things play out and then jump up and say "See, we knew it. We knew it all along. I told you we shouldn't have gone into Iraq". They literally can't lose. But we all lost because Clinton did nothing. Clinton should have acted to stop these terrorists but did nothing.

Yes, it's easy to play Monday morning quarterback when your ass isn't on the line to make the tough decisions. Don't worry, most reasonable peope, which instantly excludes most liberals, see this for what it is.

Android
11-03-2005, 10:27 AM
I also find it interesting that many claim during "this administration", the Intel "misled" all these fine, good hearted Liberals. Well then, what about all those quotes during (I'm not allowed to bring him up but here it goes anyways) the Clinton administration? We all have heard and read what our fearless liberal leaders were saying about Saddam and his weapons long before George ran for office. Or do we just do the ostrich here.

Bumblebee
11-03-2005, 11:05 AM
During Clinton's administration, they set up a wall between the FBI and the CIA, which prevented them from talking to each other about security.
Which probably affected our knowledge to act swiftly before 9-11.

Benado
11-03-2005, 11:30 AM
They will just say that they were echoing what they were told by this president.

That CANNOT be the argument because 6 of those quotes I posted were years before this president was even president.


All of these are before Pres. Bush:

"If Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -- Bill Clinton, February 17th, 1998


"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeleine Albright, Clinton's secretary of state, November 10th, 1999


"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has ten times since 1983." -- Sandy Berger, Clinton national security advisor, February 18th, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction." -- Madeleine Albright, February 1st, 1998

And there's plenty more!



And let's also say that we were attacked again. You can bet that the liberals would have been screaming that George Bush didn't protect us.

That is certainly true.

RightisRightLeftisWrong
11-03-2005, 09:53 PM
So true IHL I couldn't of put it any better.