Make sense not war.

[IHL]

From: Kate S**** [mailto:hi*****@mac.com]
Sent: Tue 8/31/2004 3:59 AM
To: IHL
Subject: make sense not war.

why do you insist on dividing up our country? ugh. we have different opinions on things...everyone does. but HATING someone because of it is awful.
hate is a very strong word and should be used wisely. i am disgusted by this website. 'one nation' ever hear that? one nation. so why are you trying to define that line between democrats and republicans? why? we having different opinions yes, but those shouldn't run our lives as it is obviously running yours. and it most certainly shouldn't be making people hate and hurt other people.
no offense but i dont see how you can think that what bush is doing in iraq isnt wrong. it's KILLING people. you want to support our troops? BRING THEM HOME. killing people is not the answer. and neither is hate. neither is war.
and p.s. your little photo gallery and the picture of kerry and his running mate. and how you so cold heartedly made it look as though they were lovers. what would be wrong with that even if it were true? you have a problem with gay people?
-make sense not war.

oh. and p.s. ==== your little 'LIBS only care about themselves' bullshit. we want peace asshole. and if thats too much to ask then how do you ====ing survive in this world? how? i have never been so angry in my life.
by making this website you not only created a deeper crack between the democrats and the republicans but your making a site truly about hate and [even though i find patriotism over-rated] your being completely un-american by ranting about it.
i'm praying for you bud. cause you're one of those people that are so afraid of being over-powered by someone who doesn't think like you do, that you have to rant and rave about how much you HATE someone. hate isnt something you should be proud of.
so stick it.

This site does not promote hate. Granted, the site name contains the word but that is how most people find the site in the first place - it's a marketing thing. Moveon.org promotes infinitely more hate than this site. Pleasevote.com shows our president biting the head off of a baby. Those are hate sites and the left has that market cornered. Liberals seem to think if we ignore problems they will go away. I do believe what the president is doing in Iraq is the correct thing. The sacrifice of our brave soldiers has saved hundreds of thousands of lives, stopped rape rooms and mutilation of Iraqi citizens. Liberals turn their back on those atrocities. As far as me ranting on this site - compare anything I've written on this site to what you've written in this email and then see who is doing the ranting. - IHL

[Guns R Cool]

the only reason we are here now is because of war, killing, and hate. It's human nature

[Liberty]

War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. — John Stuart Mills

[Rose]

That woman is what is dividing our country. We get rid of all the liberals, then our country will be unified again. They are what is dividing our country!

[boris]

the only reason we are here now is because of war, killing, and hate. It's human nature
why dont you go fight in the war?i think that if everybody who voted bush was made to go to war and really support bush.even the old gramps n grans.then it would have been quite different.

also people have evolved.
ps.hitler shot himself.follow your leader.oh no, bush is your leader.sorry.my bad.

[DoubleU]

why dont you go fight in the war?i think that if everybody who voted bush was made to go to war and really support bush.even the old gramps n grans.
No you don't, you just cut and paste that from another website, we all know you are incapable of any thought. As I am sure you are well informed the democrats supported draft bills in both the House and the Senate so it should be anybody who voted for a democrat should be over in Iraq. Then again how about anybody who didn't vote for Bush leave this country like they promised? After all they hate you hate this country so much why not leave?

Oh whoops my bad your 15 years old and don't know anything about politics or the world.

[boris]

no, those are my thoughts.but they are prolly too black and white.as a lot of people voting for democrats were just voting anti-bush. when they didnt wanna vote an alternative in vain.basically i believe if you support the war you should go fight in it.
and im not in america anymore.

[NewKindOfSoldier]

"democrats supported draft bills in both the House and the Senate"

who says he supports the democrats?!?!

==== this two-party system

"we all know you are incapable of any thought"

cogito, ergo sum

scio, non te scire

[CognitiveTruth]

==== this two-party systemIf you don't like the two party system, then what do you advocate?

A many-partied system? Countries with more parties tend to be weaker and never gets things done.

A one party system? And you call us nazis...

A no party system? That would be anarchy. If that was your intent then why didn't you say "==== this partisan system"?

[All Dead]

Hey moron, (^ you) fascism is the complete opposite of anarchy. Anarchy is freedom, fascism the government controls everything, like now.

[CognitiveTruth]

Did I ever compare anarchy and fascism?

[All Dead]

No, because you don't know true anarchy.

[CognitiveTruth]

You miss my point. You said "==== this two party system". I said "Fine, then what kind of system do you want? No parties, one party, or many parties?" If you can't have two parties, then you have to pick one of those options. Choose one and explain why.

[lordnyra]

No, because you don't know true anarchy.

anarchy is chaos, ultimate freedom meaning i could shoot you and nothing will happen to me.
do u see any anarchy's on earth that are successful (somalia isnt successful)
NO
anarchy is very bad that is true anarchy
you dont know your own lack of government
your making yourself look as dumb as the person who sent this email
im sure you all love the terrorists as much as the emailer

[Douglas Adams]

I just noticed this.....check this (http://ihatedemocrats.com/letters_29.html) out. Who was the letter written to?

[rightwingxtremist]

I just noticed this.....check this (http://ihatedemocrats.com/letters_29.html) out. Who was the letter written to?

Wow, good call! So nice to know that we are worth getting nasty E-mail, but not worth getting one tailored to our individual needs. Sheesh.

- Nate

[Oi_Ve]

AN ANARCHIST! THIS INDEED A TREAT! I THOUGHT YOU WERE ALL EXTINCT! I KNEW McCARTHY WASN'T SMART ENOUGH TO CATCH EVERYONE OF YOU!

I love anarchists because I get to teach whenever I meet one. Listen up class, school is back in session:

Germany after WWII had a very unstable government. It's beloved kaiser was nowhere to be seen; the officials who were still around weren't very competent; and basically for a great deal of time there was general anarchy. Then a nice chap with slicked-to-the-side hair, a fiery personality, a natural talent for speaking, and an oh so fashionable mustache. This fellow organized the people, gave them hope, gave them food, gave them some sort of purpose, something to follow, and made their streets safer by convincing everyone to turn in their firearms. Then this nice man made certain people wear colored patches. Then all these patch wearing people mysteriously went on a vacation to some sort of summer camp or something like that.
France after the French Revolution, the monarchy which had, for so long, ruled the land, was gone and there was anarchy again. Well, there was anarchy for a little while, but then this one fellow named Robespheire used the idea of monarchists being everywhere to kill off all his enemies, as well as innocent people, and eventually it came around to bite him in the ass cause he was later found guilty of being one. Then this Corsican chap came along, invented the grapeshot, got some power and a few years later he's invaded italy, prussia, egypt......pretty much all of continental europe and beyond. And he was crowned emperor. What was his name again?
Japan during the Sengoku Jidai (Age of the Country at War 1500's). Several warring factions from all over Japan are waging war against each other and there is no real set of laws or any order. Then a particular general by the name of Oda, followed by another guy called....oh what was it...oh yes. Tokugawa, came along and beat the shit out of everyone else. Then they claimed the title of Shogun and ruled all of Japan with an iron fist.
The moral to this lesson?
Anarchy creates a circle. Anarchy leads to disorder. Disorder leads to desperation. Desperation leads to glorifying competence and talent in either war or speech. Glorification leads to arrogance. Arrogance leads to deification. Deification leads to totalitarianism. Therefore Anarchy = Totalitarianism aka Fascism.
Class dismissed

[Wadi66]

ooooh! I know the first one! pick me! pick me! It was hitler right!? :biggrin:Couldn't be, Oi_Ve said WW 2 not 1. Nice try though.... unless of course Oi_Ve meant 1

[RightisRightLeftisWrong]

I think Oi meant Hitler because he meant WWII if it was WWI Hitler was a Colonel. thanks for the history lesson Oi in enjoy history. Anarchy is a laugh :icon_lol:

[Wadi66]

I think Oi meant Hitler because he meant WWII if it was WWI Hitler was a Colonel. thanks for the history lesson Oi in enjoy history. Anarchy is a laugh :icon_lol:Yeah I think he was referring to Hitler too. Just wanted to give him a bad time in saying after WW2 instead of after WW1.

[Goose]

France after the French Revolution, the monarchy which had, for so long, ruled the land, was gone and there was anarchy again. Well, there was anarchy for a little while, but then this one fellow named Robespheire used the idea of monarchists being everywhere to kill off all his enemies, as well as innocent people, and eventually it came around to bite him in the ass cause he was later found guilty of being one. Then this Corsican chap came along, invented the grapeshot, got some power and a few years later he's invaded italy, prussia, egypt......pretty much all of continental europe and beyond. And he was crowned emperor. What was his name again?
Napoleon Bonaparte. I don't think he invented the grapeshot though.

Just wanted to add a thanks to Oi_Ve for the history lessons. Also the gross but informative African parasite lesson on another thread.

[Oi_Ve]

oh yes bonaparte invented the grapeshot. and what better test subjects that a group of dirty royalists. nothing says 'love me, I'm a hero' liek killing royalists
and yes, I meant WWI. typo again. I'm old. shoot me

[Wadi66]

and yes, I meant WWI. typo again. I'm old. shoot metypos really are okay (I was just poking fun at you) and as for being old.... I'm right there beside you.