Bush the Nazi

[tronpants]

One of the most dispicable things that the leftist front has done has been to compare President Bush to Adolf Hitler. In no way are these two related. Last time I checked, Pres. Bush didn't have plans for the domination of Europe, the extinction of the Jews and other "inferior" races, and the conquering of Russia for its raw materials.

This is just another example of how the left will say and do anything to discredit our president. You can't compare a National Socialist and a Capitalist, they are like black and white, oil and water. Liberals never cease to amaze me in their unmatched stupidity and ignorance.

PS- I know this is old news, but a girl in my WWII class tried to make comparisons between the two today. But don't worry, our professor shot her down like an F-16. It was pretty awesome!!

[Bumblebee]

Does this mean your professor is not a liberal? I'd be interested to hear some of what he said.

[Guns R Cool]

Hitler
Bush
National Socialist
Capitalist
Dictator
Democratically-elected president
Atheist
Baptist
Conqueror
Liberator

[Argonath]

You have to remember, BEFORE you start saying all liberals think that, it was a dumbass senator, or congressman, I forget. . . No one knows that Hitler is the farthest thing from Bush than me.

Oh, and Guns, a funny thing you might find ironic. Hitler said to Chamberlan (the PM of Britain at the time) that he'd only take back the Sudentanland (I know spelling is wrong, Oi_Ve, dont remind me :icon_mad:). So, in his eyes, and many people in Germany, believed that he was a liberator. The difference between the two in that sense is that Bush isn't claiming land back in the name of America.

[Schmitty27]

Still, Hitler went after the Sudetenland even though it was against the Treaty of Versailles. Technically we were still in a state of war with Iraq. The problem was that Europe was acting like the parents of a spoiled kid and gave Hitler whatever he wanted. And with America in an isolationist state we weren't about to get involved in their politics.

[RightisRightLeftisWrong]

Feeling real liberal today Agronath?

Bush isnt a Nazi you just cant compare him to Hitler it makes no sense if Bush was trying to take over the country by now he would of already have done it.

[Argonath]

No, as I said, no one knows how different Bush is to Hitler than me. Trust me. Besides, you cant deny history. Hitler did believe he was liberating the parts of Germany which had been taken away by the treaty of Versailles, Bush believes that he is liberating Iraq. They both BELIEVE in something, not they're both mad and trying to arm a country while the world is in a global depression so they can take over the whole of Europe. I never said that. Just to make myself clear. . .I KNOW BUSH ISNT HITLER!!!!!

[Argonath]

The problem was that Europe was acting like the parents of a spoiled kid and gave Hitler whatever he wanted.

That was Chamberlan, not Europe. I doubt the Chechs were exstatic about being occupied.

[Schmitty27]

From what I've learned it was every European victors role in World War I to uphold the Treaty of Versailles and make sure Germany stayed demilitarized and didn't go after more territory. (We would have helped if we were a part of the League of Nations) When Hitler went off and started to gain territory everyone sat by and let him go. First he got Austria, no one did anything, maybe thinking he was just going to stop there. Next, Chezchoslovokia, again people were worried but said I'm sure he'll stop there. Next he opened his war factories and was beginning to ally with Italy, uh-oh, looking suspicious, France...Great Britain...anyone gonna stop him? Maybe tomorrow. Well tomorrow came and WWII began. Everyone saw he was violating the treaty no one did a thing.

[Argonath]

France was the undeclared watcher of Germany, being the most powerful close nation at the time. Hitler took Austria, declaring he was taking back the Sudentonland and that there was all he would take. So, since everyone, yes, us to, were having severe economic troubles, there was little to nothing we could do, seeing as how Hitler had already amassed a huge army. Upon taking Chezchoslovakia, he was asked to stop by Chamberlan. Chamberlan, being the ignorant pussy he was, took Hitlers word. Then, surprise, surprise, Poland is now in a deep pile o' crap! Then, ww2 started. EVERYONE was helpless. Anyway, this is going off the main point. BUSH IS NO HITLER! I know that damn well, so dont say I'm saying it.

[tronpants]

Does this mean your professor is not a liberal? I'd be interested to hear some of what he said.

Well, he didn't seem very mad, but I believe his exact words were, "That comparison cannot be made. National Socialism and Capitalism are polar opposites. Making that argument is an indication to me that you are not comprehending the class material." The girl, needless to say, shut her mouth pretty quickly.

I'm not sure if he's liberal or conservative, but he has mentioned before that the deaths in Iraq are absolutely nothing compared to WWI and WWII (I took WWI with him last semester). He's also makes a lot of arguments against pacifism and has noted on many occasions that it's a terrible policy. I guess it is possible he is a conservative. I know my other professors aren't!!

[Dagummit]

Well, he didn't seem very mad, but I believe his exact words were, "That comparison cannot be made. National Socialism and Capitalism are polar opposites. Making that argument is an indication to me that you are not comprehending the class material." The girl, needless to say, shut her mouth pretty quickly.

I'm not sure if he's liberal or conservative, but he has mentioned before that the deaths in Iraq are absolutely nothing compared to WWI and WWII (I took WWI with him last semester). He's also makes a lot of arguments against pacifism and has noted on many occasions that it's a terrible policy. I guess it is possible he is a conservative. I know my other professors aren't!!

I teach at the local community college part time and I think some of my students are shocked that I come off so conservative because most of their professors are libs (you ought to see the faculity parking lot, about 6 in every 10 cars has a Kerry sticker on it).

At the beginning of every class, I ask the students what has been happening in the country and the world (this is a business class mind you) and one student piped up about Miers and her stance on being pro-life. This other girl through in a "omg" comment and said "it's a womens right to choose". I quickly snapped back with a "what about the innocent unborn baby's choice?" The class went silent. If I were to say what was on my heart, I'd probably be fired. It would have went something like "Yes you whore, you have the right to choose, you can start by choosing to keep your legs closed!"

[Argonath]

As a teacher, you must strive to keep anything like that from bursting out. Not for biasedness sake, but because the student feels awful whenever they talk to you because they think you hate them. I'm a student in high school right now, so I know very well what I'm talkin' about. Plus, it'll make you better than the lib teachers, because you have restraint.

[Bumblebee]

Well, he didn't seem very mad, but I believe his exact words were, "That comparison cannot be made. National Socialism and Capitalism are polar opposites. Making that argument is an indication to me that you are not comprehending the class material." The girl, needless to say, shut her mouth pretty quickly.

I'm not sure if he's liberal or conservative, but he has mentioned before that the deaths in Iraq are absolutely nothing compared to WWI and WWII (I took WWI with him last semester). He's also makes a lot of arguments against pacifism and has noted on many occasions that it's a terrible policy. I guess it is possible he is a conservative. I know my other professors aren't!!
Thank you tronpants. Yes, he is a conservative, you answered that question with what he said, and by you knowing that your other professors were not conservatives. He sounds like a very good teacher. Wish there were more like him around.

[Dagummit]

As a teacher, you must strive to keep anything like that from bursting out. Not for biasedness sake, but because the student feels awful whenever they talk to you because they think you hate them. I'm a student in high school right now, so I know very well what I'm talkin' about. Plus, it'll make you better than the lib teachers, because you have restraint.

I know what to do as a teacher and what not to do. Yes, I was reserved and didn't say what I felt, but at the same time I did come to the defense of the unborn. THere is nothing wrong with that. Sometimes students also need to realize that there is a time and a place to voice their opinions and what not to say. There are often two sides to every road.

[Argonath]

Oh, I know that. i'm glad that you didn't go further. The point is, you might want to keep it to a "please quiet down now" or something, for the student's own pscyche. I hate thinking that the teacher doesn't like me, and while you didn't go all out, saying something simple without saying the two-roads thing you just said could make the student think you will grow a grudge on them. And I hate that feeling so damn much. I'm glad your not ranting on it or some such with the kid, though. That's much better than the idiot teachers. "Oh, Bush is at it again!" or some such. bah, I hunger :icon_twis . . .

[Dagummit]

Oh, I know that. i'm glad that you didn't go further. The point is, you might want to keep it to a "please quiet down now" or something, for the student's own pscyche. I hate thinking that the teacher doesn't like me, and while you didn't go all out, saying something simple without saying the two-roads thing you just said could make the student think you will grow a grudge on them. And I hate that feeling so damn much. I'm glad your not ranting on it or some such with the kid, though. That's much better than the idiot teachers. "Oh, Bush is at it again!" or some such. bah, I hunger :icon_twis . . .

Keep in mind, this is college also. They are adults (18+), so they have to reallize that when they say something out loud, that itmay come back on them. And I would never hold a grudge. I don't do that.

[FKLBRLS]

It was good to show some restraint however had I been one of the students I would've rather heard what you actually WANTED to say.