View Full Version : War on Terror
WhiteAfricanAmerican
10-04-2005, 06:28 PM
Mulims, like Jews, consider pigs to be unclean, and comming into contact with them (Let alone eating them) is enough to get you a one way ticket to hell.
Muslims particularly are pig-o-phobic.
There's a story about an American General in the Philipines in the early 1900's
Gen Blackjack Pershing.
The story goes that he was having trouble with militant islamic attacks on soft targets, so he captured three ====s, and had them tied up infront of a firing squad. There was a massive hole in the ground infront of the tied up ====s, and a stack of pigs were thrown in there, slaughtered and the soldiers in the firing squad dipped their bullets in the pigs blood.
The soldiers then killed 2 of the 3 ====s, and buried them with the pigs while the third ==== watched.
The 3rd ==== was released. As a result of this, there were no more ==== attacks in the philipines until the first Bali night club attack.
Now, there is a debate as to whether the above occured. There is a Blackjack Pershing, but no one can say for sure whether this story occured.
Be that as it may, this is why the idea of dropping dead pigs on a city makes some sense, although the collective shriek from people like PETA, Amnesty and God knows who else would be demented.
The manner in which to defeat terrorism, is to terrorize the terrorists.
Argonath
10-04-2005, 10:34 PM
Sounds a bit rash, WFF. But, I wasn't there, so. . . well. Also, can you call them something other than ====s? It's getting odd to read. . . how about, um, hmm . . . mabye, uh, people bombs? I dont know, something.
WhiteAfricanAmerican
10-05-2005, 04:32 AM
well. Also, can you call them something other than ====s?
Now why in the hell would I want to do that?
I could call them ragheads, but that wouldn't be right 'cause there are terrorists other than muslims, not to menetion 'raghead' is a racist statemtent.
====s they are, ====s they shall remain.
Argonath
10-07-2005, 03:35 PM
==== is also a racial statement. It was one used on blacks back in tha day. Mabye "terrorcysts"? its got a ring.
WhiteAfricanAmerican
10-07-2005, 07:38 PM
Argo, it's always a good idea to have some small idea what in the hell you are talking about before you open your mouth.
Argonath
10-07-2005, 08:09 PM
Are you saying that my mother, who worked for ten years while fighting for equal rights; and even worked on banning the controversial "Frito Bandito" commercial, is wrong about what blacks were unfairly called back when? Let me hear your credentials on how long you fought against companies keeping blacks from working in them.
WhiteAfricanAmerican
10-08-2005, 06:50 AM
Ok, let me rephrase and put it this way.
====, is a generically accepted term by soldiers across the globe to refer to the enemy, but more specifically terrorists/insugents.
It's been used by my dad who served in the early '60's and i believe there were troops older than him who used it too.
Whether some troops brought that home and used it to describe blacks here, is irrelevant.
However, the term ====, in the true sense of the word does not describe a black, it describes a terrorist/insurgent.
The manner of use you are refering to is out of context to what I have been discussing, thus your point of departure is flawed.
It would be the same a me saying "Look, I just bought a pup" then you say, "You can't use that term, because some one somewhere used that term to describe young prostitutes, and it's sexist." that statement of yours would be irrelevant, because the fact still remains I bought a young dog.
Argonath
10-08-2005, 02:59 PM
*Grumbles, then goes to eat breakfast*
WhiteAfricanAmerican
10-08-2005, 03:17 PM
ROFL
You're a good sport Argo, you really are.
emptythemag
12-02-2005, 02:24 AM
====, is a generically accepted term by soldiers across the globe to refer to the enemy, but more specifically terrorists/insugents.
It's been used by my dad who served in the early '60's and i believe there were troops older than him who used it too.
However, the term ====, in the true sense of the word does not describe a black, it describes a terrorist/insurgent.
Actually, no.
==== is a derogatory term for an Asian; derived from Korean slang for "person" and passed down by Korean War Veterans. It was also used in the Vietnam era (the 60's, when your father served).
emptythemag
12-02-2005, 02:34 AM
Koreans are naturally brutal warriors. Historically during their attacks they leave nothing alive, from people to animals. Buildings are destroyed, and every living thing in the village dies.
Effective combat.
Needless to say Koreans aren't fun enemies
Tell that to the Marines (http://www.kmike.com/MarineCorpsKorea/Marines.htm).
WhiteAfricanAmerican
12-02-2005, 11:57 AM
Empty, that might be the case IF my father served in the US Forces in Korea.
As it is, he served in the Rhodesian Army in the 1960's/70's and I served in the South African Defence Force. in the late 80's early 90's.
Your point then is?
emptythemag
12-03-2005, 01:52 AM
My error in the assumption that your father served in the US Forces. Either way though, you were incorrect about the definition of a ====.
Wicked Jester
12-03-2005, 02:13 AM
Yawn...........
WhiteAfricanAmerican
12-03-2005, 06:54 AM
My error in the assumption that your father served in the US Forces. Either way though, you were incorrect about the definition of a ====.
By virtue of the fact that at least two foreign militaries used the term, amoung others, as a reference to terrorists tells me that is not the case. Particularly neither country ever exchanged pleasantries with any SE Asian countries.
I was not refering to the original source of the word, I have been using this word as a smaller noun for the current terrorists we face today. As such my use of the noun is accurate.
hairybush
12-04-2005, 08:03 PM
====s, towelheads....they are all the enemy
the-man
12-04-2005, 11:06 PM
See now what I would of done is gone in and without telling anyone I would have napalmed all the problem citys just like they did in world war two. I also would of just bombed the hell out of those mountains where bin laden was hiding and massed the troops in.
Argonath
12-04-2005, 11:44 PM
I just wouldn't have FOX or CNN tell our plans seven hours before hand.
hairybush
12-05-2005, 04:58 PM
I just wouldn't have FOX or CNN tell our plans seven hours before hand.
+1 or geraldo rivera
rightwingxtremist
12-30-2005, 07:51 AM
Morning...
A border lock-down and Isreal-style concrete barriers would be nice!
- Nate
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.