PDA

View Full Version : Sony Using Reviews From Fictional Movie Critics



Miro Satan Fan
08-03-2005, 12:37 PM
LOS ANGELES (http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/movie_review_lawsuit) - A judge approved an agreement calling for Sony Pictures Entertainment to pay $1.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing the studio of citing a fake movie critic in ads for several films, an attorney said Tuesday.
Well, I guess that’s one way to generate buzz about your movie. In reality, though, shouldn’t the fact that the movie producers had to fabricate positive reviews from fictional critics tell them that maybe the movie itself wasn’t all that good?

And people wonder why Hollywood boxoffice earnings are down. Not that anyone puts a whole of stock in those “Fantastic” and “Funniest movie of the year” slugs that seem to be omnipresent in movie advertising.

Apparently, because of this lawsuit, Sony has to give everybody who saw one of the movies in question in the theater is entitled to $5.00 from the settlement.


Moviegoers who saw the films “Vertical Limit,” “A Knight’s Tale,” “The Animal,” “Hollow Man” or “The Patriot” during their original theater runs must file a claim to be eligible for a $5 per ticket reimbursement, said lawyer Norman Blumenthal, who represented a group of filmgoers who sued Sony Pictures in 2001.

Any funds remaining after claims are satisfied would go to charity, he said.

Sony Pictures declined comment. The studio did not admit any liability under terms of the settlement.
If you’re one of these people I suppose you could file a claim (if its worth your time to collect on that $5.00). I believe this is the law firm (http://www.bamlawca.com/home.html) that handled the case. You could probably contact them to learn how to file a claim.

Wadi66
08-03-2005, 12:40 PM
I would assume a ticket stub would be required to verify that you saw the movie. Now how many people save movie stubs??

HOKIEHUNTER
08-03-2005, 01:09 PM
haha irrationally i do!!! I have the stub from every movie i've seen for the past 6 ir 7 years. I saw all of those movies, so i may be getting $25 in the near future...

FightinDaMan
08-03-2005, 01:30 PM
Sony Music is in trouble for payola, Sony pictures in trouble for making up reviews... I wouldn't be investing in Sony stock any time soon since this might just be the beginning.

Wadi66
08-03-2005, 01:34 PM
haha irrationally i do!!! I have the stub from every movie i've seen for the past 6 ir 7 years. I saw all of those movies, so i may be getting $25 in the near future...Hokie, why am I not surprised??? :icon_lol:

Miro Satan Fan
08-03-2005, 01:39 PM
Sony Music is in trouble for payola
If I am correct, I might not be, I read that Sony and Payola scam was nothing, because it is not illegal. It was blown-up out of proportion by Eliot Spitzer who didn't understand that a company like Sony could legally give money to a private business.

short circut
08-03-2005, 03:19 PM
If I am correct, I might not be, I read that Sony and Payola scam was nothing, because it is not illegal. It was blown-up out of proportion by Charles Schumer who didn't understand that a company like Sony could legally give money to a private business.

i do beleive payola is illegal. not usualy treated as a major crime though.

http://www.history-of-rock.com/payola.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola#Payola

http://www.dontbuycds.org/payola.htm

Miro Satan Fan
08-03-2005, 03:47 PM
But if radio station WRCX (made up) is a private company, Sony has every right to give them money to play their songs. If WTCX(made up) is a public radio station it would be illegal to give money to play songs. Do you get what I am saying? Sony did everything legally, Eliot Spitzer just ran his mouth off with out looking at the facts.

short circut
08-03-2005, 03:57 PM
it may be a privat broadcasting company, but it is regulated by the fcc and the government. it does not matter. law is law. read the links. paying the station directly is illegal.

Miro Satan Fan
08-03-2005, 04:14 PM
it may be a privat broadcasting company, but it is regulated by the fcc and the government. it does not matter. law is law. read the links. paying the station directly is illegal.
I did and I summed them up for you, Paying KROQ is fine, Paying WABC wrong